Re: Requirements (was: How does IKEv2 provide solution to remote access?)

[Uri Blumenthal <uri@bell-labs.com>]

Stephane Beaulieu wrote:
> > I agree completely.  To be useful IKEv2 needs to address remote access.
> 
> FWIW, this was all discussed in Atlanta and it seemed we had concensus on
> it.  The plan is to try and roll this into the next rev of IKEv2.
> 
> Cheryl had put out a requirements draft a while ago which included these
> things and a few more.  At the time, it was largely ignored because of the
> IKEv2 vs. JFK discussions.  Should we attempt to revive this and move it
> ahead in the WG to make sure we don't forget anyting else??? 

YES. Emphatic yes.

> ....If we've
> forgotten something in the requirements, I'd rather find out about it now
> rather than summer '2003.

(:-) With you.