Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2

[Avram Shacham <shacham@shacham.net>]

Even simpler is to keep existing IPComp implementations unchanged.

Regards,
avram

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Avram Shacham wrote:

>
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:36:43 -0500 (EST)
> From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
> To: IP Security List <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
> Subject: Re: (more#4 fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Avram Shacham wrote:
> > With your observation that packet size is not the problem, what is the
> > extra complexity to *announce* a 16-bit CPI and the (optional)
> > algorithm-related parameters...
>
> However simple it may be to allocate, free, manage, and announce CPIs,
> it is simpler not to do so.
>
>                                                           Henry Spencer
>                                                        henry@spsystems.net
>
>
>
>