[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dhcp/modecfg summary

To: Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com>
Subject: Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 20:24:44 -0500
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2003 11:11:36 PST." <82CC1E573B94A648B87027C9419E2C055A6B62@losgatos>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com> writes:
    Michael> I would say the address allocation for a group of PC behind the
    Michael> peer gateway is out of scope of this discussion.  It should be
    Michael> done AFTER IKE is done, not within IKE.

  Yes, I agree. It is a trivial deployment of a DHCP relay.

  Maybe the inner IP for the DHCP relay that is co-located on the IPsec
gateway has to be allocated somehow, and that is in scope. However, it is the
identical problem to the laptop on the road case.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPkRcW4qHRg3pndX9AQGq/QP/b1HKsyn8I9NuZXxuBCcEcIlM7Cf5LNpI
enEOdgRcFAPlMNsnMstypNo3rbqDkaJ4v3ETHSPRtt4jcJ+b7bA/rBSp9d865AQM
t1aLhvSaw5wyG6RDorQ32FPN4ASeGFjtKnSyGl0LQ+DA8XUBevGFtxEmSSiaOqzq
GEXQr/e/LI4=
=1Mdy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
  - From: Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
Next by Date: Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
Prev by thread: RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
Next by thread: RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread