[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSec over GRE why ?

To: <ssakhuja@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Date: 25 Feb 2003 12:23:44 -0500
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <009c01c2dc94$e5b6ace0$a3074d0a@apac.cisco.com>
References: <009c01c2dc94$e5b6ace0$a3074d0a@apac.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

Why don't you ask the person who told you to use GRE?

-derek

"Sandeep Sakhuja" <ssakhuja@cisco.com> writes:

> Hi
> 
> I am Sandeep. I am working on implementing IPSec lab. When implementing IPSec
> across different routing domains we need to use GRE or IIPTran. My Question is
> why do I have to use the same. IPSec does not support multicast packets that is
> known, but then my interesting traffic which I need to be protected is not the
> routing updates, so why do I have to use GRE ?
> 
> Thanks
> - Sandeep
> 

-- 
       Derek Atkins
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com

References:
- IPSec over GRE why ?
  - From: "Sandeep Sakhuja" <ssakhuja@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Some IKE/NAT questions
Next by Date: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ctr-03.txt
Prev by thread: IPSec over GRE why ?
Next by thread: RE: IPSec over GRE why ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread