[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05

To: shacham@trpz.com
Subject: Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 20:42:39 -0500
Cc: dharkins@trpz.com, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, ippcp@external.cisco.com
References: <200302281717.h1SHHAE64102@homebrew.trpz.com><15967.51785.279370.267569@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com><3E5FF092.3090409@trpz.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

>>>>> "Abraham" == Abraham Shacham <shacham@trpz.com> writes:

 Abraham> Paul Koning wrote:
 >> IKEv1 handled this by negotiation, but 90% of what it does for
 >> IPcomp is unnecessary and confusing.

 Abraham> Could you substantiate "90%", detail what is exactly
 Abraham> "unnecessary", and "confusing" to whom?

We discussed that a while back, and Henry Spencer just summarized it
very nicely.  As for "confusing" -- to the implementer of IKEv1.

     paul

Prev by Date: Re: Another NAT Traversal question
Next by Date: RE: Another NAT Traversal question
Prev by thread: comments/concerns about ikev2-05
Next by thread: RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread