[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Secure remote access with IPsec

To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Subject: Re: Secure remote access with IPsec
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:56:45 +0100
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, antonio.forzieri@cefriel.it (Antonio Forzieri)
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:17:07 +0800. <15995.25907.497444.196791@tero.kivinen.iki.fi>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   	SOURCE-ADDRESS-CHANGED		   	24587
   
               This notification is sent when the other end has changed

=> A question "en passant": is a payload more appropriate?
(I can't find a rationale about payload vs. notification, the
only argument is payloads can be made critical...)

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Secure remote access with IPsec
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>

References:
- Re: Secure remote access with IPsec
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Secure remote access with IPsec
Next by Date: Re: AES-based PRF for IKEv2
Prev by thread: Re: Secure remote access with IPsec
Next by thread: Re: Secure remote access with IPsec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread