Re: IKEv2: ECN hack for broken h/w?

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>]

> The upshot (IMHO) is that I don't see a case for putting a
> hack into IKEv2 to cope with existing "broken" hardware, but
> I thought I'd put this message out to allow those with
> differing views to express them.

Agree.  Moreover, should evidence surface that this is a more common
case than we currently think, it's clear to me at that the base ikev2
spec contains sufficient flexibility to allow a critical "broken-hardware"
payload to be specified later in a separate document.

I see no reason to hold ikev2 for this.

						- Bill