Re: complication in ikev2

[Antonio Forzieri <antonio.forzieri@cefriel.it>]

Ravi ha scritto:
> May I know why ikev2 should listen on both 500 and 4500.?What purpose 
> does it solve? In my view, we are complicating the protocol and 
> implementation by doing this. If both IKEv1 and IKEv2 exist (most 
> probably they exist as separate processes or tasks and it is easy if we 
> let IKEv1 and V2 exist separately), ikev1 can listen on port 500 and 
> ikev2 listen on 4500.
Agreed. I state this in a previous message, and I was given this response
[COPY&PASTE BEGIN]
=> nothing but the current draft wording suggests that IKE_SA_INIT
always runs over UDP 500. This should be fixed.
[COPY&PASTE END]

[SNIP]


-- 
------------------------------------------------
Antonio Forzieri
CEFRIEL - Politecnico di Milano
Tesista Area E-Service Tecnologies
Tel: 02-23954.334 - email: forzieri@cefriel.it
ICQ# 177683894
------------------------------------------------