RE: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs Configuration Payload

["Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>]

To me it's a bits on the wire change.  I don't particlarly like the 280+
bytes extra or the extra round trips but I don't think they are evil.  DHCP
end to end may be good in some cased but don't see it as a necessity (others
opinions differ here).  I'm leaning toward CP just because it's in the
current rev.

Darren

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> [mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Theodore Ts'o
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 3:29 PM
> To: Darren Dukes
> Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs Configuration Payload
>
>
> Darren, thanks for your good summary of the pros versus cons of DHCP
> over IKE vs. Configuration Payload.  Only one thing was missing: your
> weighing on which proposal you think is superior.  :-)
>
> To the rest of the list, the amount of comments on this item has been
> extremely underwhelming.  Barbara and I would like to call on
> supporters of the two proposals to send their comments to the list
> ASAP.  We note that in San Francisco the wg had decided that in the
> absence of strong support, the default would be to stay with the
> existing text in the ikev2 document (Configuration Payload).
>
> 						- Ted