[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Confirm decision on identity handling.



Am I the only one spotting the typo?

s/identify/identity/

Otherwise it is ok.

Niklas

> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 16:09:13 +0530
> From: Ravi <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
> 
> 
> --------------000404070104050906070507
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This text is very clear. I support this wording
> -Ravi
> 
> 
> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>We are better off with just the first sentence and a revision of the 
> >>one proposed here by Ted:
> >>
> >>   The Identification Payload, denoted ID in this memo, allows peers to
> >>   assert an identify to one another. This identity may be used for policy
> >>   lookup, but does not necessarily have to match anything in the CERT
> >>   payload; both fields may be used by an implementation to perform
> >>   access control decisions.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Paul's proposed revision seems clearer and reflects the discussion in
> >San Francisco.  Does anybody have any problems with this text, or
> >should we just go with it?
> >
> >							- Ted
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> The views presented in this mail are completely mine. The company is not 
> responsible for whatsoever.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ravi Kumar CH
> Rendezvous On Chip (i) Pvt Ltd
> Hyderabad, India
> Ph: +91-40-2335 1214 / 1175 / 1184
> 
> ROC home page <http://www.roc.co.in>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------000404070104050906070507
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
>   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
>   <title></title>
> </head>
> <body>
> Hi,<br>
> <pre wrap="">This text is very clear. I support this wording
> -Ravi
> </pre>
> <br>
> Theodore Ts'o wrote:<br>
> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20030411192548.GC30438@think">
>   <pre wrap="">On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:53:10PM -0700, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
>   </pre>
>   <blockquote type="cite">
>     <pre wrap="">We are better off with just the first sentence and a revision of the 
> one proposed here by Ted:
> 
>    The Identification Payload, denoted ID in this memo, allows peers to
>    assert an identify to one another. This identity may be used for policy
>    lookup, but does not necessarily have to match anything in the CERT
>    payload; both fields may be used by an implementation to perform
>    access control decisions.
>     </pre>
>   </blockquote>
>   <pre wrap=""><!---->
> Paul's proposed revision seems clearer and reflects the discussion in
> San Francisco.  Does anybody have any problems with this text, or
> should we just go with it?
> 
> 							- Ted
> 
>   </pre>
> </blockquote>
> <br>
> <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
> <title>signature</title>
> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
> <meta name="author" content="Ravi">
> <br>
>  <br>
>  The views presented in this mail are completely mine. The company is not
> responsible for whatsoever.<br>
>  
> <hr width="100%" size="2"><font color="#3333ff"><b><font
>  face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Ravi Kumar CH<br>
>  Rendezvous On Chip (i) Pvt Ltd<br>
>  Hyderabad, India<br>
>  Ph:</font><font size="3" face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">       +91-40-2335
> 1214 / 1175 / 1184</font></b></font><br>
>  <br>
>  <a href="http://www.roc.co.in";>ROC home page</a><br>
>  <br>
>  <br>
>  </div>
> <br>
> </body>
> </html>
> 
> --------------000404070104050906070507--
>