RE: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs Configuration Payload

[Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>]

I vote for CP.
And Darren and I can submit the draft we presented in SF to make life easy
for everyone to implement w/ DHCP, RADIUS, LDAP, etc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theodore Ts'o [mailto:tytso@mit.edu]
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: Darren Dukes
> Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs 
> Configuration Payload
> 
> 
> Darren, thanks for your good summary of the pros versus cons of DHCP
> over IKE vs. Configuration Payload.  Only one thing was missing: your
> weighing on which proposal you think is superior.  :-)
> 
> To the rest of the list, the amount of comments on this item has been
> extremely underwhelming.  Barbara and I would like to call on
> supporters of the two proposals to send their comments to the list
> ASAP.  We note that in San Francisco the wg had decided that in the
> absence of strong support, the default would be to stay with the
> existing text in the ikev2 document (Configuration Payload).
> 
> 						- Ted
>