RE: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs Configuration Payload

[Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jknowles@SonicWALL.com [mailto:jknowles@SonicWALL.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 3:00 PM
> To: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com; tytso@mit.edu
> Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com; owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: RE: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs 
> Configuration Payload
> 
--SNIP--

> Lately, I've been wondering if we can't just add an optional
> DHCP CP payload type.  Not sure if that would make everybody
> happy or make everybody mad.
> 

That is what Darren Dukes and I proposed in the doc we wrote and presented
in SF. Send a DHCP server addr in CP along w/ IP and DNS/WINS (if needed)
and do the rest of the DHCP extensions via INFORM in protected by CHILD-SA.