RE: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: DHCP over IKE vs Configuration Payload

[Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>]

> > > Lately, I've been wondering if we can't just add an optional
> > > DHCP CP payload type.  Not sure if that would make everybody
> > > happy or make everybody mad.
> > > 
> > 
> > That is what Darren Dukes and I proposed in the doc we 
> wrote and presented
> > in SF. Send a DHCP server addr in CP along w/ IP and 
> DNS/WINS (if needed)
> > and do the rest of the DHCP extensions via INFORM in 
> protected by CHILD-SA.
> 
> no, that's not the same thing.
> 

care to clarify?