[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vendor IDs and reserved values





> Hi again. Section 3.12 says:
>> If parameter values "reserved for use by consenting parties" are
>> used, they must be preceded by a Vendor ID payload that disambiguates
>> them.
> This will hinder interoperability. Given that Vendor IDs are also
> "reserved for use by consenting parties", this requirement doesn't
> make sense. A private value is a private value: the two sides have
> already agreed to what it means. Sending a private Vendor ID doesn't
> add any information, and is another place where a failure can happen.
> This sentence should be removed.

I agree. Any objections?

      --charlie