[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-03.txt based on SENDWG experiences

itojun wrote:

> 	even if there's very little use of AH in the community, major change
> 	to AH that SEND requires would require another IP protocol #, IMHO.

I'm not sure how significant the changes are, e.g. much of it can be seen
as the properties of a new algorithm.

Nevertheless, I'm personally in favor of a SEND approach which
uses ND options. More details at