[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-03.txt based on SENDWG experiences
itojun wrote:
> even if there's very little use of AH in the community, major change
> to AH that SEND requires would require another IP protocol #, IMHO.
I'm not sure how significant the changes are, e.g. much of it can be seen
as the properties of a new algorithm.
Nevertheless, I'm personally in favor of a SEND approach which
uses ND options. More details at
http://www.piuha.net/~jarkko/publications/send/dafts/draft-send-ndopt.txt
--Jari