[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IKEv2 payload #14
Stephen C. Koehler writes:
> 3. Move any conflicting payload definitions to new numbers in IKEv2, but
> don't change the ones that have not changed in structure.
> 4. Make all IKEv2 payloads have numbers distinct from those in IKEv1,
> regardless of whether the structure or meaning has changed.
I would say number 3 or 4 are good. Actually I think 4 is better.
> I would very much like for IKEv2 to use option (3). (4) is perhaps overkill,
> but I could be convinced otherwise.
BTW, this is not only about the paylaod number 14, the payload numbers
15, and 16 are used by the draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-06.txt for IKEv1
also...
--
kivinen@ssh.fi
SSH Communications Security http://www.ssh.fi/
SSH IPSEC Toolkit http://www.ssh.fi/ipsec/