[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IKEv2 payload #14

To: "Stephen C. Koehler" <koehler@securecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: IKEv2 payload #14
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 19:26:18 -0400
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2003 11:01:46 CDT." <200306231921.PAA00447@lists.tislabs.com>
Reply-to: sommerfeld@east.sun.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Renumbering the payloads so they're non-overlapping sounds like a good
idea.  Now's the time to do it..

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IKEv2 payload #14
  - From: "Stephen C. Koehler" <koehler@securecomputing.com>

References:
- Re: IKEv2 payload #14
  - From: "Stephen C. Koehler" <koehler@securecomputing.com>

Prev by Date: Re: QoS selectors (was LAST CALL: IKE)
Next by Date: Q: ikev2 notify status ranges reserved to IANNA
Prev by thread: Re: IKEv2 payload #14
Next by thread: Re: IKEv2 payload #14
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread