RE: IKEv2 and NAT/T

[Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>]

per an informal bof at ietf57

-there have not been IPR statements officially presented to IETF wrt NAT-T
-WG chairs queried several times over the last 2+ years the person(s) who
made original comments, and have not heard back from said persons

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Friedl [mailto:Markus.Friedl@informatik.uni-erlangen.de]
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 1:28 AM
> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: IKEv2 and NAT/T
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:14:14AM -0400, 
> Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com wrote:
> > Just to let people know, I posted a revised IKEv2 draft 
> incorporating
> > the recent comments.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> since IKEv2 includes support for NAT/T, I'd like to know how
> IKEv2 is affected by the IPR/patent claims that exist for several
> NAT traversal methods.  Does anyone have pointers about the nature
> of these IPR claims and what exactily is affected by these claims.
> Encapsulating ESP in UDP seems very trivial, so I doubt that
> this is all the patents are about.
> 
> Any help appreciated.
> thanks, -markus
>