Re: IKEv2 and NAT/T

[Markus Friedl <markus@openbsd.org>]

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:34:18PM -0700, Daniel de Young wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:02, Gregory Lebovitz wrote:
> > per an informal bof at ietf57
> > 
> > -there have not been IPR statements officially presented to IETF wrt NAT-T
> > -WG chairs queried several times over the last 2+ years the person(s) who
> > made original comments, and have not heard back from said persons
> 
> Are people who make these claims required to clarify their statements
> before a draft is finalized?  I certainly hope so...

It's still very confusing.  The statements fail to specify what
part of the drafts if covered by the IPR claims.  Just prepending
an UDP header to ESP is rather trivial.  And so on.

-markus