Mail Index
Thread Index
IKEv2 and NAT traversal unclear
From
: Ari Huttunen <Ari.Huttunen@f-secure.com>
Re: ECN and issue 58
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
RE: ECN and issue 58
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@cs.columbia.edu>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Possible missing messages
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@cs.columbia.edu>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Markku Savela <msa@burp.tkv.asdf.org>
Fwd: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: The remaining IKEv2 issues
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: Possible missing messages
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: ECN and issue 58
From
: Black_David@emc.com
RE: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: "Mohan Parthasarathy" <mohanp@tahoenetworks.com>
Ipsec and IPV6
From
: Samira Elakili <samira.elakili@polymtl.ca>
No Subject
From
: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Re: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: Markku Savela <msa@burp.tkv.asdf.org>
RE: IPsec issue #46 -- No need for nested SAs or SA bundles
From
: "Mohan Parthasarathy" <mohanp@tahoenetworks.com>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Re: ECN and issue 58
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Re:
From
: Mark Baugher <mbaugher@cisco.com>
RE: Ipsec and IPV6
From
: Patrick René Guillemin <Patrick.Guillemin@etsi.org>
Re: ECN and issue 58
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Last call on 2401bis issues: #47, #48, #49, #57
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: Last call on 2401bis issues: #47, #48, #49, #57
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Ready for IETF last call for draft-ietf-ipsec-aes-xcbc-prf-00.txt
From
: Barbara Fraser <byfraser@cisco.com>
rfc2402bis minor concerns
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-algorithms-04.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #71 -- Add definition of reserved SPIs
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #70 -- Add diffserv (IPv4) and class (IPv6) asselectors
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #69 -- Multiple protocols per SPD entry
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Last Call: 'A Traffic-Based Method of Detecting Dead IKE Peers' to Informational RFC
From
: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
RFC 3566 on The AES-XCBC-MAC-96 Algorithm and Its Use With IPsec
From
: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Issue tracker update
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@cs.columbia.edu>
new issues on the tracker
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@cs.columbia.edu>
Re:2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
Re: 2401bis Issue #69 -- Multiple protocols per SPD entry
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
RE: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: "Wenxiao He" <wenxiao.he@hp.com>
RE: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re:2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re:2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
Re:2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: "Wenxiao He" <wenxiao.he@hp.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Crash / Reboot / Loss of State
From
: "Charlie Kaufman" <ckaufman@microsoft.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #68 -- Negotiating VPN context
From
: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #68 -- VPNs with overlapping IP address ranges
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #72 -- Explain why ALL IP packets must be checked
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #74 -- Inbound SA lookup -- multicast & unicast
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue #73 -- IP Option & Ext Hdr handling in Tunnel Mode
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
How to reduce number of IPSEC security policies that need to be configured?
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
Re: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Re: Fwd: IPsec issue #50 -- tunnel vs transport mode at link layer
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: How to reduce number of IPSEC security policies that need to be configured?
From
: "Srinivasa Rao Addepalli" <srao@intotoinc.com>
SPD issues
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RFC 3602 on The AES-CBC Cipher Algorithm and Its Use with IPsec
From
: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Re: some concerns about last IKEv2 draft
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-05.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
2401bis Issue # 75 -- TOS (now ECN) copying in tunnel mode
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding &dummy packets
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 77 -- Should AH be mandatory?
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding & dummy packets
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 77 -- Should AH be mandatory?
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding& dummy packets
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding & dummy packets
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding& dummy packets
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 79 -- Detection of dead peers and dead SAs
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 78 -- PMTU issues
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 80 -- Security gateway discovery
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue #67 -- IPsec management traffic
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding &dummy packets
From
: Tylor Allison <allison@securecomputing.com>
[Remote access]: Find the right SA on outbound processing
From
: Antonio Forzieri <antonio.forzieri@cefriel.it>
Re: SPD issues
From
: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
Re: [Remote access]: Find the right SA on outbound processing
From
: Antonio Forzieri <antonio.forzieri@cefriel.it>
Final editing instructions for ikev2 document
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: Final editing instructions for ikev2 document
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
2401bis Issue # 85 -- DROP'd inbound packet -- does not match SA
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 81 -- Handling outbound red fragments
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 84 -- DROP'd outbound packet
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 83 -- DROP'd inbound packet -- missing requiredIPsec protection
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 82 -- Creation of SAs -- clarifications
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # DD -- Anti-replay notification
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
out of office
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: Final editing instructions for ikev2 document
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 77 -- Should AH be mandatory?
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 84 -- DROP'd outbound packet
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 82 -- Creation of SAs -- clarifications
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 79 -- Detection of dead peers and dead SAs
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 78 -- PMTU issues
From
: Ravi Kumar <ravivsn@roc.co.in>
No Subject
From
: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
No Subject
From
: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Re: 2401bis Issue # 75 -- TOS (now ECN) copying in tunnel mode
From
: Charles Lynn <clynn@bbn.com>
No Subject
From
: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Re: 2401bis Issue # 84 -- DROP'd outbound packet
From
: Charles Lynn <clynn@bbn.com>
2401bis Issue # 86 -- Add IPv6 mobility header message type asselector
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 76 -- More explanation re: ESPv3 TFC padding& dummy packets
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 86 -- Add IPv6 mobility header message type asselector
From
: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 86 -- Add IPv6 mobility header message typeas selector
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 86 -- Add IPv6 mobility header message type asselector
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: 2401bis Issue # 86 -- Add IPv6 mobility header message type asselector
From
: Scott Fluhrer <sfluhrer@cisco.com>
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.4.9