[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IANA document
See at @@@
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com [mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:01 PM
To: Scott G. Kelly; Michael Richardson
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: IANA document
At 12:27 PM -0800 2/3/04, Scott G. Kelly wrote:
...
>There is much to be said for public review and consensus.
Exactly right. It is quite reasonable for the IPsec community to ask
the IESG to make sure that the IKEv2 IANA reviewer does everything in
public, and even asks for comments on each action. This is a trivial
task (mailing lists and web sites, you know), and would certainly
make it so that if the reviewer said "no" to something, people who
cared would know immediately to talk to the IESG.
@@@ I would note the MIME type and charset type procedures, which
require that the request be posted on a public mailing
list for two weeks, and subject to discussion, before an allocation/
registation can be made. These are generally considered to be quite
successful.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium