[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues

To: "Bora Akyol" <bora@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:18:38 -0500
Cc: "'Stephen Kent'" <kent@bbn.com>, "'Tero Kivinen'" <kivinen@iki.fi>, "'Barbara Fraser'" <byfraser@cisco.com>, "'Charles Lynn'" <clynn@bbn.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:07:17 PST." <00c301c3f723$fa3577f0$060a0a0a@amer.cisco.com>
Reply-to: sommerfeld@east.sun.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> For example just by cutting port based selectors for TCP and UDP,
> cost of doing security policy checks goes down exponentially for
> most software and linearly for most HW.

say what?   not in all implementations it doesn't..

						- Bill

References:
- RE: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues
  - From: "Bora Akyol" <bora@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues
Next by Date: Re: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues
Previous by thread: RE: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues
Next by thread: RE: SAs that carry fragments Was: Re: Some IKEv2 issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread