Re: [Cfrg] Re: your mail

["David A. McGrew" <david.a.mcgrew@mindspring.com>]

CFRGers,

is there anyone with another viewpoint about Hugo's proposed changes?  
If not, we will go ahead and report this back to the IPsec WG.

thanks,

David

On Feb 25, 2004, at 9:18 AM, canetti wrote:

>
> I concur.
>
> Ran
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, David A. McGrew wrote:
>
>> Here is my personal $0.02: the change is well motivated, the solution
>> is good (it requires storing two extra keys, which seems not to be a
>> big deal), and if the spec can be rev'ed in the next couple of weeks, 
>> I
>> vote to do it.  I spoke with several people about this issue who had
>> similar sentiments.  Other opinions welcome.
>>
>> David
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>