[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: AD requests WG review of final revisions todraft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-06.txt <= 48hrs please

To: "William Dixon" <ietf-wd@v6security.com>
Subject: RE: AD requests WG review of final revisions todraft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-06.txt <= 48hrs please
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:55:30 -0500
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-reply-to: <200402271022.i1RAM1nb006444@rs9.luxsci.com>
References: <200402271022.i1RAM1nb006444@rs9.luxsci.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

William,

Thanks for the response at this late date. Since you indicated a 
willingness to adopt my suggested text for the first issue, I'm happy 
going forward.

Steve

Prev by Date: Re: AD requests WG review of final revisions to draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-06.txt <= 48hrs please
Next by Date: Re: IPsec -- new versions of AH and ESP
Previous by thread: Re: 2401bis Issue # 93 -- Clarification re: the selector "name"
Next by thread: Re: IPsec -- new versions of AH and ESP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread