[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-rfc2401bis-01: editorial nits



 In your previous mail you wrote:

   (2) On page 33: "Note: The source address that appears in the encapsulating
       tunnel header MUST be the one that was negotiated during the SA
       establishment process."
    
       Should this be the destination address, not the source address?

=> even fixed (:-) this statement is a bit too strong for MOBIKE which
is supposed to allow to update the address(es). I can't propose a better
wording but obviously one is needed...

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr