Re: AH and mutable fields, how deep to look?

[Satoshi Inoue <inoue@ntes.ipv6.nec.co.jp>]

# It's a bit of an old issue, but never mind :-)

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:11:32 -0500
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> wrote:

> The intent was to treat everything after AH as opaque, in IPv6 as 
> well as IPv4. What change to the graphics would help convey this 
> better?

Isn't it better to write about this as `diffs from rfc2402' in
rfc2402bis? I think there should also be some descriptions on interop
probs that this might cause.