Re: Final editing changes to IKEv2

["Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:41:43PM -0000, Michael Roe wrote:
> I was referring to a different part of Charlie Lynn's message. I was talking
> about bidirectional SA's that protect some MIPv6 messages and not others, not
> unidirectional SA's.
> 
> Suppose that you want to have a SA that only protects the Home Test
> message (MH type = 3). Charlie Lynn's suggestion was...  "and text
> saying that the Mobility Header Type should be in the most
> significant 8 bits and the least significant 8 bits should be 0 for
> the "start" field of the range and 255 for the "end" field)".

That was the part of Charlie Lynn's message which we specifically
commended to Charlie's attention, and indeed it is in
draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-13.txt.

						- Ted