RE: 2nd try

["Bora Akyol" <bora@cisco.com>]

Thanks

Would you mind adding a single sentence to this effect
to the text when the fragment text is rolled in to make it
consistent with the main SA treatment.

Bora


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com 
> [mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Kent
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:03 AM
> To: Bora Akyol
> Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: RE: 2nd try
> 
> 
> At 7:28 AM -0800 4/1/04, Bora Akyol wrote:
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >This looks good, one question about the fragment SA(s):
> >
> >If we have several "parallel" SAs to support different levels
> >of QoS (for the main SAs), do we need to have the same amount
> >of fragment SAs as the main ones?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Bora
> 
> Good question. In general, for approach #2, one needs only a single 
> SA between two implementations to carry all non-initial fragments 
> between them. But, if you chose to have multiple SAs between two 
> implementations, for QoS differentiation, then you might want 
> multiple SAs to carry non-initial fragments, one for each supported 
> QoS class. Since support for QoS via distinct SAs is a local matter, 
> not mandated by 2401/2401bis, this too should be a local choice.
> 
> Steve
>