[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2nd try
Tero,
I was responding to your message point by point, disagreeing in
several cases, but let's skip to the end:
<SNIP>
> > How about a compromise? We could make #2 a MAY and #3 a SHOULD. A
>> SHOULD is almost a MUST, with a loophole as noted below (from RFC
>> 2119):
>
>That would be accectable for me.
>
>> This would allow a hardware implementation to not support #3, if
>> doing so would adversely impact overall performance.
>
>Ok.
Well, since we agree on a solution, let's not argue about the rationale :-)
Steve