[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2nd try



Tero,

I was responding to your message point by point, disagreeing in 
several cases, but let's skip to the end:

	<SNIP>

>  > How about a compromise? We could make #2 a MAY and #3 a SHOULD. A
>>  SHOULD is almost a MUST, with a loophole as noted below (from RFC
>>  2119):
>
>That would be accectable for me.
>
>>  This would allow a hardware implementation to not support #3, if
>>  doing so would adversely impact overall performance.
>
>Ok.

Well, since we agree on a solution, let's not argue about the rationale :-)

Steve