RE: [Ipsec] Specification of BGP IPsec policy

["William Dixon" <ietf-wd@v6security.com>]

FYI. I found David Ward's (Cisco) expired draft from two years ago. David,
have you received sufficient interest recently to re-activate this draft ?
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ward-bgp-ipsec-00.txt

If you do, please review Steve's latest guidelines:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bellovin-useipsec-03.txt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-admin@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-admin@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of William Dixon
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 5:27 PM
> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: RE: [Ipsec] Specification of BGP IPsec policy
> 
> The reason I ask is because the UK NISCC guidance says "use IPsec".
> 
> http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm 
> 
> I'm surprised that with such initial coordination, a 
> specification of HOW to use IPsec wasn't offered in the bulletin.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ipsec-admin@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-admin@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > William Dixon
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 8:03 AM
> > To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> > Subject: [Ipsec] Specification of BGP IPsec policy
> > 
> > Does anyone have a reference configuration that is proposed for 
> > securing BGP TCP connections with IPsec ? Eg. the selector 
> definition, 
> > tunnel/transport, hash, key size, lifetimes, etc.
> > 
> > I see this draft proposes not using IPsec. So maybe nobody is doing 
> > it.
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-00.txt
> > 
> > Wm
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipsec mailing list
> > Ipsec@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ipsec mailing list
> Ipsec@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec