Re: [Ipsec] Specification of BGP IPsec policy

[Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "William" == William Dixon <ietf-wd@v6security.com> writes:
    William> There are many ISPs with hundreds and perhaps thousands of
    William> BGP peering partners. So I respectfully disagree that a
    William> recommendation is not needed.  I'm guessing this is the

  Okay, let's start at the top.

  which authentication mechanism scales to thousands of BGP peering
partners? and if you say X.509, then please let us know which CA to buy.

- --
]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQIvhDIqHRg3pndX9AQGnUQQAmXkD67JTLRWMSm4dU4iCIoC/YzhUU6eL
YTKwLU5ALjbZkUpn+GdGme4nSIXdBF1qfJXqECsovkt1HNvvkmXkESnj/5eTWL+m
bkPIqwX/Emzxz0Gf7Sh3/npCnLrtK7wntYtPs55gqdenXoTVhBi6JLtyDlZAWPbU
VUgHJD6Ag7s=
=lJze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec