Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal

[Joern Sierwald <joern@f-secure.com>]

At 08:36 27.04.2004 -0700, Chris Stillson wrote:
>Just wondering what different implementations use for the VID to
>signify an implementation supports nat-t (since there is no rfc # yet)
>
>By my calculations the md5 hash of "RFC XXXX" is
>810fa565f8ab14369105d706fbd57279, which seems to make as much sense as
>anything at this point. But, other people may have a different
>solution which will make interoperability tricky :) So, before
>releasing anything to the public, I would like to get this issue
>sorted out.
>
>
>chris stillson
>IPSEC crypto monkey
>x82477

8a:8f:e1:12:55:30:4d:3b:0a:ee:ba:b8:24:da:90:f6
for "draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-05"

I don't know any other solution. And this one will certainly stay in
even when the RFC is released.

Jörn


_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec