[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal



>Joern Sierwald wrote:

>8a:8f:e1:12:55:30:4d:3b:0a:ee:ba:b8:24:da:90:f6
>for "draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-05"

>I don't know any other solution. And this one will certainly stay in
>even when the RFC is released.

>Joern

That sounds very reasonable to me. Except that that current draft if
revison 8, giving
8f8d83826d246b6fc7a8a6a428c11de8, although I come up with
80d0bb3def54565ee84645d4c85ce3ee for revision 5....

Maybe the easiest thing to do now is to just get everyone to tell the
list what they are using so we can all just recognize each others vid's
and work together. Although, hopefully, this point will soon be moot.


chris stillson
IPSEC crypto monkey
x82477

Note: Preceding comments written by an engineer. There is nothing
to read into them. He really has no hidden motives or agendas.

1.Right Understanding 2.Right Thoughts 3.Right Speech 4.Right Action 
5.Right Livelihood 6.Right Effort 7.Right Mindfulness 8.Right Concentration 
--Please inform author if he has forgotten about any of these

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec