[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
Tero, what is the schedule now for getting the IKE NAT-T & UDP-ESP drafts to
RFC ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-admin@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-admin@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Tero Kivinen
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 8:06 AM
> To: Joern Sierwald
> Cc: Chris Stillson; ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
>
> Joern Sierwald writes:
> > floats to port 4500
> > two OA payloads
> > NAT-D 15, NAT-OA 16, UDP-Tunnel 3, UDP-Transport 4 VID of unknown
> > value
>
> Forgot that second OA payload, so there is some changes in
> the protocol.
>
> > md5("RFC NATT"). I like that one. or md5("RFC NAT-T"). or
> > md5("draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike").
> > Will be a big problem if somebody DOES change the draft
> again, obviously.
>
> DO NOT use the numbers specified in the drafts from the IANA
> allocated area. The NAT-D and NAT-OA payload numbers WILL
> change, as the payload number 15 and 16 are already taken by RFC 3547.
> --
> kivinen@safenet-inc.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipsec mailing list
> Ipsec@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec