[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal

To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:50:53 -0700
In-reply-to: <20040428162718.GZ22519@binky.central.sun.com>
List-help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IP Security <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,<mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,<mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <16527.40492.492637.72108@fireball.acr.fi><200404281420.i3SEK3TI015884@rs9.luxsci.com><20040428162718.GZ22519@binky.central.sun.com>
Sender: ipsec-admin@ietf.org

At 11:27 AM -0500 4/28/04, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>And it should be possible to get an RFC number allocated for it now, no?

No. The RFC Editor normally only allocates RFC numbers after doing an 
initial review of the document, and that can take weeks or months.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

References:
- Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
- RE: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
  - From: "William Dixon" <ietf-wd@v6security.com>
- Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
  - From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
Next by Date: RE: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
Previous by thread: Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
Next by thread: Re: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread