RE: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal

[Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>]

Given this morning's official announcement:

>The IESG has approved the following document:
>
>- 'Negotiation of NAT-Traversal in the IKE '
>    <draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The industry should either (a) wait for an RFC number or (b) use 
something now that reflects the official version that will turn into 
an RFC. I propose the latter.

The MD5 of "draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-08.txt" is 
074d5b89c6ea3b8337b34c630cfd05f1.

People who implemented earlier versions of the draft will use 
different vendor-IDs, which is appropriate. However, for the "final" 
vendor-ID, this seems good enough.

Does anyone have any objection to using 
0x074d5b89c6ea3b8337b34c630cfd05f1 for the vendor-ID of what will 
become the RFC for this document?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec