[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ipsec] VID for nat traversal



Paul Hoffman / VPNC writes:
> Does anyone have any objection to using 
> 0x074d5b89c6ea3b8337b34c630cfd05f1 for the vendor-ID of what will 
> become the RFC for this document?

Yes, I have objections. As I said the numbers allocated in the draft
are WRONG, they will change. We are not going to get those numbers
that are currently in the draft, so nobody should put out any products
using those numbers, which means that the VID should really matter. 
-- 
kivinen@safenet-inc.com

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec