[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2

To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 07:56:31 -0700
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <16555.5046.667046.853895@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
List-help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IP Security <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,<mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,<mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F5F4EC6358916448A81370AF56F211A502B2F688@RED-MSG-51.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20040511180439.GE8839@thunk.org><p06100584bccc5e3ebaf5@[10.20.30.249]><16552.44133.542923.965806@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi><p06100553bccffc881204@[10.20.30.249]><16555.5046.667046.853895@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Sender: ipsec-admin@ietf.org

At 10:58 AM +0300 5/19/04, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>One wierd thing it thas 4.4.1.1 says support for OPAQUE is MUST.

Then that *needs* to be corrected in the next version of the draft.

>So I assume that your vote would be on both on being MAY?

Correct.

>My preferred way would be #3 being SHOULD and #2 being MAY.

That makes some sense too; it's just more adventurous than I would be 
with this protocol without a lot more support from other vendors.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

References:
- [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: "Charlie Kaufman" <charliek@microsoft.com>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
Next by Date: [Ipsec] Can't beat our software prices!
Previous by thread: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
Next by thread: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread