Re: [Ipsec] OCSP in IKEv2

[Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>]

Michael Myers <mmyers@fastq.com> wrote:
> I strongly encourage amendment of IKEv2 to accommodate OCSP.
> TLS has already done so, as has the OWA community.  Why not
> IPSEC?  I realize this notice is probably too late for -13 but
> might consensus could be formed for inclusion in -14 of IKEv2?

Mike,

I don't mean to be difficult, but in what way do you believe
that TLS has accomodated OCSP, except to the extent to which
it's failed to accomodate CRLs?

-Ekr


_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec