[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2

To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:05:57 +0300
Cc: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <p061005cebcd292527b41@[10.20.30.249]>
List-help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IP Security <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,<mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>,<mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F5F4EC6358916448A81370AF56F211A502B2F688@RED-MSG-51.redmond.corp.microsof t.com><20040511180439.GE8839@thunk.org><p06100584bccc5e3ebaf5@[10.20.30.249]><16552.44133.542923.965806@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi><p06100553bccffc881204@[10.20.30.249]><16555.5046.667046.853895@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi><p06100585bcd125bb179f@[10.20.30.249]><p06100500bcd26cd36d87@[128.89.89.75]><p061005cebcd292527b41@[10.20.30.249]>
Sender: ipsec-admin@ietf.org

Paul Hoffman / VPNC writes:
>      To address the above requirements, three approaches have been
>      defined. Implementations MUST support method #1 below, and SHOULD
>      support method #2 or method #3 (or both).

I can also live with that proposal....

> Editorial suggestion: breaking out the three proposals as subsections 
> (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) would make it easier to read, particularly if you add 
> more text to them.

Definately. 
-- 
kivinen@safenet-inc.com

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

References:
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
- Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>

Prev by Date: [Ipsec] Fragmentation of IPv6 tunneled packets
Next by Date: [Ipsec] STRAW POLL: Handling of fragments in RFC-2401bis (section 7)
Previous by thread: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
Next by thread: Re: [Ipsec] FW: Remaining issues for IKEv2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread