Re: [Ipsec] IKEv2 traffic selector negotiation examples

[Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>]

At 5:04 PM -0700 8/7/04, William Dixon wrote:
>One of the things that was missing during IKEv1 development was a set of
>clear examples of expected negotiation results between two host IPsec
>policies (SPD traffic selectors in QM). How would we document this for IKEv2
>under 2401 or 2401bis rules ? Or should we ? I think we will have greater
>interoperability if there is a consistent set of test cases that everyone
>uses for interop testing. This is primarily a concern with overlapping SPD
>entries when IPsec policy is deployed to secure host-to-host communication.
>

I think thus would be useful, but only for 2401bis, since 2401 and 
IKEv2 don't fit well together.

Steve

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec