Mail Index
Thread Index
No Subject
From
: Anonymous
No Subject
From
: Anonymous
No Subject
From
: Anonymous
RE: new to VPN
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: new to VPN
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: Ciphersuites MUSTs and SHOULDs
From
: Roger Younglove <ryounglove@networksgroup.com>
RE: new to VPN
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Revised identity, again
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-01.txt
From
: "The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman" <ho@alum.mit.edu>
RE: new to VPN
From
: John Lindal <jafl@trlokom.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Bora Akyol <bora@cisco.com>
[IPsec and remote access] Security Policy Configuration
From
: Antonio Forzieri <antonio.forzieri@cefriel.it>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
Re: Moving forward with IKE V2: A proposal for final edits to ikev2-04
From
: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
RE: new to VPN
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: WG Last Call draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-01.txt
From
: "Geoffrey Huang" <ghuang@cisco.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Marcus Leech" <mleech@nortelnetworks.com>
Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Revised Identities (revised and revisited)
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Geoffrey Huang" <ghuang@cisco.com>
RE: Moving forward with IKE V2: A proposal for final edits to ikev2-04
From
: "Geoffrey Huang" <ghuang@cisco.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Tylor Allison <allison@securecomputing.com>
Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
RE: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Re: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
A basic question.
From
: "Bepsy Paul" <bepsy@airBB.com>
Re: Moving forward with IKE V2: A proposal for final edits to ikev2-04
From
: Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org>
RE: A basic question.
From
: "Roy, Gilles" <Gilles.Roy@arc.com>
Re: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: "Scott Fanning" <sfanning@cisco.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com>
RE: A basic question.
From
: "Balaji K" <balajik@future.futsoft.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: Moving forward with IKE V2: A proposal for final edits to ikev2-04
From
: "Victor Volpe" <vvolpe@cisco.com>
RE: Moving forward with IKE V2: A proposal for final edits to ikev2-04
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Question about IPSec and NAT
From
: "BUYCK Jacky FTRD/DMI/CAE" <jacky.buyck@rd.francetelecom.com>
Re: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@bstormnetworks.com>
On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
RE: On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
Re: On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: "Stephane Beaulieu" <stephane@cisco.com>
RE: A basic question.
From
: "Bepsy Paul" <bepsy@airBB.com>
RE: On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
a few nits on pure modecfgv2
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
RE: Ciphersuites for IKEv2, revised
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: "Geoffrey Huang" <ghuang@cisco.com>
RE: On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: Michael Choung Shieh <mshieh@netscreen.com>
RE: Sensationalism? [was Re: FW: Man in the middle attack against RFC3456.]
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
ike2-v4: request or response
From
: "jpickering@creeksidenet.com" <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: BSingh@Nomadix.com
Re: new to VPN
From
: ALAIN PATRICK AINA <aalain@trstech.net>
Re: On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
RE: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
IPsec VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: BSingh@Nomadix.com
Re: On revised identity (was "Moving forward...final edits...)
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: IPsec VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: IPsec VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: dhcp/modecfg summary
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
IKEV2: Issue #1: Legacy Authentication
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
IKEv2: Remaining Issues and Process
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #1: Legacy Authentication
From
: Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org>
Re: Secure legacy authentication for IKEv2
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: IKEv2: Remaining Issues and Process
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #1: Legacy Authentication
From
: "Marcus Leech" <mleech@nortelnetworks.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: Ciphersuites for IKEv2, revised
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
RE: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: BSingh@Nomadix.com
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
RE: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: "Greg Carter" <greg@carter-engineering.com>
RE: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <VanAkenD@thmulti.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
IPSec/IKE Implementaion on Solaris 8.0
From
: Suresh Kumar <protogen24@yahoo.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: "Michael Richardson" <mcr@freeswan.org>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Brian Korver <briank@briank.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Ready for IETF Last Call draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-01.txt
From
: Barbara Fraser <byfraser@cisco.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
RE: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: "Greg Carter" <greg@carter-engineering.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: Ready for IETF Last Call draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-01.txt
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
RE: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Van Aken Dirk <Dirk.VanAken@thomson.net>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity (fwd)
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: Ready for IETF Last Call draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-01.txt
From
: Barbara Fraser <byfraser@cisco.com>
RE: IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: Black_David@emc.com
IKEv2: Remaining Issues - ECNFIX
From
: Black_David@emc.com
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: "Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: Modefg considered harmful
From
: jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: Tylor Allison <allison@securecomputing.com>
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: Ready for IETF Last Call draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-01.txt
From
: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Brian Korver <briank@briank.com>
[Fwd: Re: ike2-v4: request or response] == major issue
From
: "jpickering@creeksidenet.com" <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: typical IPsec-based VPNs incl. modecfg vs. DHCP
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #3: DHCP vs. Configuration Payload
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: a proposal of address management for IKEv2
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
IKE-hybrid mode authentication
From
: Harshwardhan Mittal <mittal@mihy.mot.com>
RE: IKE-hybrid mode authentication
From
: "Stephane Beaulieu" <stephane@cisco.com>
Re: IKEV2: Issue #4 Revised Identity
From
: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Re: [Fwd: Re: ike2-v4: request or response] == major issue
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: IKEV2: Issue #2: Cipher suites
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: IKEv2 Terms & Definitions
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: [Fwd: Re: ike2-v4: request or response] == major issue
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: [Fwd: Re: ike2-v4: request or response] == major issue
From
: "jpickering@creeksidenet.com" <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-ecnfix-01.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
(fwd) Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect MIPv6 Signaling to ProposedStandard
From
: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Question about EAP payload
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Software Library for programatic implementation of IPSec/IKE
From
: "Mohammad Awad" <maa1074@hotmail.com>
Fwd: Last Call: Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents to Proposed Standard
From
: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
What is the relation between IKE and MIKEY?
From
: "Deuk-Whee Kwak" <dwkwak@kjist.ac.kr>
Re: Software Library for programatic implementation of IPSec/IKE
From
: "Ahmed Bin Abbas Ahmed Ali Adas" <alaadas@kaau.edu.sa>
RE: Question about EAP payload
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: Software Library for programatic implementation of IPSec/IKE
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
RE: Question about EAP payload
From
: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
RE: Question about EAP payload
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
Some IKE/NAT questions
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: "Sandeep Sakhuja" <ssakhuja@cisco.com>
Re: Some IKE/NAT questions
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-05.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
RE: Some IKE/NAT questions
From
: "Fridie, Brian" <BFridie@Datavision.com>
Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ctr-03.txt
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
OPEN ISSUES WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-05.txt
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
RE: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: "Shelton, Raymond A." <SheltonR@health.missouri.edu>
IETF56 - Call for Agenda Items
From
: Barbara Fraser <byfraser@cisco.com>
Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: "Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Some IKE/NAT questions
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: IETF56 - Call for Agenda Items
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: dhcp-over-ike.txt
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Now a question on legacy authentication
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: Now a question on legacy authentication
From
: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Ari Huttunen <Ari.Huttunen@f-secure.com>
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
RE: OPEN ISSUES WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-05.txt
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
The CR payload still
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: Now a question on legacy authentication
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Van Aken Dirk <Dirk.VanAken@thomson.net>
Re: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>
RE: IPSec over GRE why ?
From
: "Shashi Kiran" <shashi_kiran@nortelnetworks.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: "Stephane Beaulieu" <stephane@cisco.com>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Tylor Allison <allison@securecomputing.com>
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: Now a question on legacy authentication
From
: "Andrew Krywaniuk" <askrywan@hotmail.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Uri Blumenthal <uri@bell-labs.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@east.sun.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Tylor Allison <allison@securecomputing.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
KE payload
From
: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@nortelnetworks.com>
RE: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
remove
From
: Martin Falconer <dipsy@indigo.ie>
Re: CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange in IKEv2-05
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
comments/concerns about ikev2-05
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
RE: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
UI suites (was: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05)
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
RE: remove
From
: "Wong, Stephen" <stephen.wong@intel.com>
Re: comments on IKEv2-05
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
IKEv2-05: IPComp (editorial) comments
From
: Abraham Shacham <shacham@trpz.com>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Abraham Shacham <shacham@trpz.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Ari Huttunen <Ari.Huttunen@f-secure.com>
Re: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: "Andrew Krywaniuk" <askrywan@hotmail.com>
IPsec -- new versions of AH and ESP
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
Re: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: "Jayant Shukla" <jshukla@trlokom.com>
RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
RE: Another NAT Traversal question
From
: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
RE: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
RE: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
IPsec -- new versions of AH and ESP
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
comments on ikev2 05 (editorial)
From
: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
RE: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Brian Korver <briank@briank.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-doi-tc-mib-07.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
temp-draft-lebovitz-ipsec-scalable-ikev2cp-00.txt [WAS: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...]
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Abraham Shacham <shacham@trpz.com>
bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Clarification re: new versions of AH and ESP
From
: Karen Seo <kseo@bbn.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ccm-02.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (editorial)
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: CP(CFG_REQUEST) required?
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
QoS and IKEv2
From
: "Jesse Alpert" <jalpert@CheckPoint.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd-02.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-xcbc-mac-03.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: Black_David@emc.com
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Brian Korver <briank@briank.com>
Re: Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Jayant Shukla <jshukla@earthlink.net>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Abraham Shacham <shacham@trpz.com>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: "Valery Smyslov" <svan@trustworks.com>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Dan Harkins <dharkins@tibernian.com>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Brian Korver <briank@briank.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3-04.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-02.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Atsuhiro Tsuji" <tsuji.atsuhiro@jp.panasonic.com>
Re: Auth Method
From
: jeff pickering <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: "Jesse Alpert" <jalpert@CheckPoint.com>
RE: temp-draft-lebovitz-ipsec-scalable-ikev2cp-00.txt [WAS: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...]
From
: "Darren Dukes" <ddukes@cisco.com>
Auth Method
From
: "Valery Smyslov" <svan@trustworks.com>
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Atsuhiro Tsuji" <tsuji.atsuhiro@jp.panasonic.com>
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: temp-draft-lebovitz-ipsec-scalable-ikev2cp-00.txt [WAS: Configuration portion of OPEN ISSUES...]
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-tutorial-01.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: "Andrew Krywaniuk" <askrywan@hotmail.com>
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-profile-02.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: The CR payload still
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-04.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-flow-monitoring-mib-02.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: "Andrew Krywaniuk" <askrywan@hotmail.com>
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: Ran Canetti <canetti@watson.ibm.com>
RE: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-tutorial-01.txt
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Atsuhiro Tsuji" <tsuji.atsuhiro@jp.panasonic.com>
Re: Auth Method
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Atsuhiro Tsuji" <tsuji.atsuhiro@jp.panasonic.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Ari Huttunen <Ari.Huttunen@f-secure.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: Black_David@emc.com
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (cryptography)
From
: Hugo Krawczyk <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Atsuhiro Tsuji" <tsuji.atsuhiro@jp.panasonic.com>
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: "Atsuhiro Tsuji" <tsuji.atsuhiro@jp.panasonic.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
IKEv2 and multiple tunnels. (Was: QoS and IKEv2)
From
: "Jesse Alpert" <jalpert@CheckPoint.com>
Re: IKEv2 and multiple tunnels. (Was: QoS and IKEv2)
From
: Markku Savela <msa@burp.tkv.asdf.org>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
RE: IKEv2 and multiple tunnels. (Was: QoS and IKEv2)
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
RE: IKEv2 and multiple tunnels. (Was: QoS and IKEv2)
From
: "Jesse Alpert" <jalpert@CheckPoint.com>
IPsec bakeoff in July 2003 confirmed
From
: Ghislaine Labouret <gl+ietf-ipsec-0303@labouret.net>
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
RE: IKEv2 and multiple tunnels. (Was: QoS and IKEv2)
From
: "Jesse Alpert" <jalpert@CheckPoint.com>
Re: IKEv2 and multiple tunnels. (Was: QoS and IKEv2)
From
: Uri Blumenthal <uri@bell-labs.com>
Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: IPsec bakeoff in July 2003 confirmed
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3-04.txt
From
: "Jimmy Zhang" <jzhang@elmic.com>
Use of AES as prf in IKEv2
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: SPI in Delete Payload of IKE / IKEv2
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: comments on ikev2 05 (editorial)
From
: Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com
Re: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: "sankar ramamoorthi" <sankar@speakeasy.net>
Re: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: jeremy.de_clercq@alcatel.be
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Tylor Allison <allison@securecomputing.com>
Re: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@airespace.com>
RE: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: "Paul Knight" <paul.knight@nortelnetworks.com>
Re: suites vs. a la carte and IPcomp in IKEv2-05
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: "jpickering@creeksidenet.com" <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
Re: Auth Method
From
: "jpickering@creeksidenet.com" <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
oakley groups
From
: Mittal Harshwardhan-A18990 <harshmittal@motorola.com>
ike2 reliable rekeying
From
: "jpickering@creeksidenet.com" <jpickering@creeksidenet.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>
Re: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>
CP consensus
From
: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-05.txt comments
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
New 12288 and 16384 bit groups
From
: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>
RE: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
RE: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@ISI.EDU>
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Re: bidding down attach on NAT-T
From
: Steve Dispensa <dispensa@positivenetworks.net>
RE: Another field for traffic selector?
From
: Mark Duffy <mduffy@quarrytech.com>
RE: QoS and IKEv2
From
: "Yoav Nir" <ynir@CheckPoint.com>
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.4.9