[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

dam-l letters.html (fwd)



Forwarded message:
From dianne  Mon Dec  6 16:25:50 1999
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 16:25:49 -0500 (EST)
From: "D. Murray" <dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Message-Id: <199912062125.QAA02515@lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
X-URL: http://www.irn.org/pubs/wrr/9601/letters.html
To: dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
Subject: letters.html


                            World Rivers Review
                      Volume 10, Number 4/January 1996
                           Letters: An Open Forum
    If the number and length of letters we're receiving from hydropower
     industry representatives is any indication, World Rivers Review is
   being taken ever more seriously by the industry. We will be reprinting
    those that are particularly worthy of response or offer insight into
    the industry and its work. Here, then, is a letter from Jan Veltrop,
     the former president of the International Committee On Large Dams
          (ICOLD) and former vice president of Harza Engineering.
                                      
   Patrick McCully's "Fear of Failure" in World Rivers Review (May 1995)
   is a peculiar mixture of facts and half truths. "New dams have become
   progressively less likely to collapse" is a fact, but "Humankind would
   do better to harbor a healthy fear of failure" is a grossly
   exaggerated opinion. The generalization on what can go wrong with dams
   is outright misleading.
   Dam safety: McCully acknowledges the thorough and careful approach to
   design of dams outlined by Robert Jansen, but then undermines this by
   stating that ultimately "economics" decide the "degree of defensive
   engineering". Dam engineers do not cut corners to trade off on safety.
   Concern for safety exceeds all other considerations. Codes of ethics
   for engineers hold sacred the protection of the public welfare.
   Lifespan and dam removal: When raising the specter of dam removal, he
   completely bypasses current trends towards prolonging dam and
   reservoir lifespan through safety monitoring, sediment control and
   management, rehabilitation of components affected by aging, addition
   of spillway capacity to accommodate large floods and strengthening of
   dams against more severe earthquakes. In addition, he seems to be
   unaware of the development of guidelines to identify, evaluate, and
   describe engineering, environmental, and socioeconomic factors
   affecting the retirement of hydroelectric facilities.
   Aging of dams: To say that "aging of dams has long been largely
   ignored" is not correct. After an eleven-year study started in 1972,
   ICOLD published "Deterioration of Dams and Reservoirs" in 1983,
   followed in 1994 by "Aging of Dams and Appurtenant Works."
   Dam failures: No dam over 125 meters high ever failed. Furthermore,
   when considering the number of years of successful operation of all
   dams in Europe and the USA over 15m high, the decrease in the number
   of incidents per 10,000 years of combined operation is spectacular;
   from 29 incidents in the decade 1910-20 to less than four between 1960
   and 1970.
   In conclusion, generalizations cloud the article and mislead the
   uninformed reader. For example, the sentence "Some dams may remain
   safe for a thousand years, others may show signs of danger such as
   cracks and leaks after less than a decade" implies that man should
   live in fear of the potential failure of ANY dam. A number of
   countries, including the US, have established hazard ratings for dams,
   distinguishing those with high hazard from the vast majority not
   listed. People who benefit from the services supplied by dams are
   entitled to be properly informed about dam safety. "Fear of Failure"
   does not meet this objective.
   Jan A. Veltrop
   Patrick McCully replies:
   To imply that economics do not affect dam design and hence dam safety
   is, at best, naive. ICOLD itself recognizes the conflict, stating in
   its 1987 guidelines on dam safety that: "To a certain degree, an
   increase in dam safety involves an increase in cost. For every dam
   project, a balance has to be found between dam safety and economy."
   It is also not realistic to hold that all engineers in all cases
   follow the engineering codes of ethics. Further, there is no
   internationally accepted code of ethics for dam builders, rather a
   mish-mash of national and state engineering codes with ambiguous
   applicability to international projects. Appeals from IRN and others
   for ICOLD to adopt an international code were turned down by Dr.
   Veltrop during his term as president.
   Many of the methods to prolong dam lifespan are largely unproven, will
   in many cases not be economically viable, and will rarely be able to
   prolong dam life indefinitely. ICOLD's reports on dam ageing
   notwithstanding, few governments or dam-building agencies have started
   to consider the cost and techniques of monitoring, maintaining and
   eventually taking down dams.
   The following quote, found in Water Power and Dam Construction,
   illustrates the industry's attitude about decommissioning: "Some key
   industry figures had a good laugh informally discussing powerplant
   decommissioning and dam removal. They shook their heads, saying that
   they would leave such activities up to their grandchildren; it simply
   was not going to happen in a serious way during their lives."
   Individual dams may be safer than before, but the huge increase in the
   number of dams means that the risk of destruction from dam failure
   remains significant. While it is true that no dam over 125m high has
   yet "failed," the 261m Vaiont Dam in northern Italy (the world's
   fourth highest) was overtopped in 1963 by a massive wave caused by a
   landslide into its reservoir. The dam withstood the force of the wave
   &shyp; but 2,600 people downstream were swept away to their deaths.
   Most high dams are still relatively young and are yet to be tested by
   the maximum flood or earthquake likely to occur during their lifespan.
   Some significant near misses &shyp; for example in 1974 at Tarbela,
   Pakistan, and in 1983 at Glen Canyon, US &shyp; give warning that it
   is only a matter of time before a catastrophic failure of a very high
   dam occurs. The 80,000 to 230,000 deaths believed to have been caused
   by the failures of Banqiao and Shimantan Dams in China in 1975 give an
   indication of the scale of disaster likely if a major dam above a
   heavily populated area were to fail.
   As Dr. Veltrop should know, the hazard ratings of dams in the US are
   not based on an engineering assessment of the soundness of the
   structures, but on the height of the dam, size of its reservoir and
   whether people live below it. According to a 1994 report by the US
   Association of State Dam Safety Officials, there are more than 9,500
   "high-hazard" dams in the US, and more than 1,800 dams which have been
   inspected and found to be unsafe.
   If ICOLD were indeed concerned that people should be "properly
   informed about dam safety" it would publicly admit that all large dams
   have the potential to fail. It would insist on maps showing downstream
   areas at risk of flooding for all large dams, complete with evacuation
   plans. To pretend that dam builders can build dams which cannot break
   is hubris equal to that of the builders of the "unsinkable" Titanic. 
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   This page last modified July 3, 1997
   International Rivers Network 1847 Berkeley Way
   Berkeley, CA 94703 USA
   phone (510) 848-1155
   fax (510) 848-1008
   email: irnweb@irn.org
   
    Home [INLINE] Campaigns [INLINE] Publications and Research [INLINE]
             Become a Member [INLINE] Feedback [INLINE] Search
     _________________________________________________________________
                                      
   Contents copyright ©1995-7 International Rivers Network. Reproduction
                             by permission only
                        International Rivers Network
                         Daniel Schacht, WebMaster