[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DAM-L WB reassesses Chad project/LS (fwd)



----- Forwarded message from Lori Pottinger -----

From owner-irn-safrica@netvista.net  Tue Dec  5 13:53:34 2000
X-UIDL: 66028cb14b13d9e84ff581e2ac22a92b
Return-Path: <owner-irn-safrica@netvista.net>
Received: from DaVinci.NetVista.net (mjdomo@mail.netvista.net [206.170.46.10])
	by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA02744
	for <dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:53:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: [(from mjdomo@localhost)
	by DaVinci.NetVista.net (8.10.0/8.8.8) id eB5ILnm24601
	for irn-safrica-list; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:21:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from owner-irn-safrica@netvista.net)]
Received: [from [192.168.1.215] ([205.178.127.217])
	by DaVinci.NetVista.net (8.10.0/8.8.8) with SMTP id eB5ILi724578
	for <irn-safrica@netvista.net>; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:21:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from lori@irn.org)]
X-Sender: lori@pop3.netvista.net
Message-Id: <v02140b07b652e3d365fe@[192.168.1.215]>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:27:00 -0800
To: irn-safrica@netvista.net
From: lori@irn.org (Lori Pottinger)
Subject: WB reassesses Chad project/LS
Sender: owner-irn-safrica@netvista.net
Precedence: bulk

Sent by Korinna Horta.


Dear colleagues and friends,

Today's Washington Post article reports on Pres. Deby's arms purchases...
No big surprise there...
Best,
Korinna


To view the entire article, go to
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23916-2000Dec4.html

World Bank Reassesses Chad Pipeline Deal


NDJAMENA, Chad &#150;&#150; In June, when the World Bank agreed to back a
controversial, 650-mile oil pipeline from this impoverished desert nation
to
Africa's Atlantic coast, it declared that it had found a way to prevent
corrupt officials from stealing the country's new wealth.

Criticized for years over projects in developing nations that failed to
return benefits to their populations, bank officials knew that the $3.7
billion pipeline--the most expensive infrastructure project now underway in
Africa--would be closely scrutinized. So they imposed strict accounting
standards and insisted on guarantees from the Chadian government to ensure
that its oil profits--predicted to total as much as $100 million a
year--would be spent to improve public health, education and vital
infrastructure here, rather than disappearing into secret bank accounts or
funding weapons purchases by those in power.

World Bank officials said that their "Chadian model" would prove they could
overcome t!
he African nation's endemic corruption and that it might be applied to
other
corruption-prone oil-producing lands.

So when Chadian President Idriss Deby declared last week that he had used
$4.5 million of the government's first oil receipts to buy weapons instead
of bolstering social programs, he sent a jolt through the bank. While the
amount diverted was relatively small, World Bank officials, diplomats and
Chadian advocacy groups expressed shock at its brazenness and concern that
it might signal how Deby might deal with future oil revenue.

Robert Calderisi, the World Bank director for Chad and several other
central
African countries, said he was "sobered and disappointed" by Deby's action,
which he called an "object lesson on the need for more transparency."

Calderisi warned that the bank and other institutions might disqualify Chad
from a program for immediate debt relief that stood to save the country
about $12 million a year. He also warned that the bank might simply b!
ar any further projects in Chad, a nation with few natural resources where
more than two-thirds of the population lives on an average of less than
$250
a year.

"We cannot defend new projects in Chad if they violate agreements with us,"
Calderisi said. "People are going to be very, very skeptical and reluctant
to help Chad if they misuse the money."

The arms purchases "should be a warning to show that when the oil money
flows, the World Bank won't have any way to know what Deby will do with
it,"
said Delphine K. Djiraibe, president of the Chadian Association for the
Promotion and Defense of Human Rights, which fought the pipeline for years.
"Deby feels very powerful and that he has nothing to worry about," she
said.

While the World Bank is financing only 3 percent of the pipeline project,
its participation was crucial in persuading a consortium of three oil
companies, led by Exxon Mobil Corp., to invest in it. Southern Chad's oil
fields, which hold an estimated 1 billion bar!
rels or more of crude, were discovered more than 30 years ago but were
never
developed--partly because of the pipeline's cost and partly because of
Chadian history.

Even by the standards of Africa's troubled post-colonial decades, Chad has
been a particularly bad case. Since its formal independence from France in
1960, it has remained dependent on aid and pervasively corrupt, scourged by
40 years of almost uninterrupted civil war and repressive dictatorships.
About 80 percent of Chadians survive by laboring to grow their own food,
often in near desert conditions. Less than three in 10 can read and write.
Even Ndjamena, the capital, has only a few paved roads and lacks regular
electricity and reliable communications with the outside world.

Citing Chad's endemic violence and corruption, human rights and development
organizations pressed the World Bank to shun the pipeline, which is thought
likely to generate $2 billion to $3 billion for the government over 25
years. These grou!
ps said the money would only escalate armed power struggles and be diverted
by authoritarian rulers to buy guns or to fatten their bank accounts.

To counter those fears, the World Bank demanded guarantees from Deby on how
the oil revenue would be spent. In a press release after it approved the
project, the bank called the agreement with Deby's government an
"unprecedented framework to transform oil wealth into direct benefits for
the poor, the vulnerable and the environment."

Deby, a general who seized power in a coup in 1990, accepted two
independent
boards--one Chadian and the other a World Bank-supervised international
body--to audit the spending of all oil revenue. He also agreed that 10
percent of the receipts would be put into a trust account abroad for future
generations of citizens.

Deby agreed further to put into law a commitment to spend 80 percent of the
oil revenue on health, education, infrastructure and rural development
programs--a step that would give Chad i!
ts first opportunity to modernize.

In May, the government received its first revenue from the project, a $25
million bonus paid by the oil consortium's junior partners, San
Francisco-based Chevron and Petronas of Malaysia. Deby publicly promised
full disclosure on how the money would be spent even though the formal
monitoring mechanisms were not yet in place.

Then, according to government sources, diplomats and World Bank officials,
the money began disappearing, just as one of the nation's endless
rebellions
in the northern Tibesti Mountains was heating up. Despite repeated
inquiries
from the World Bank and local advocacy groups, Deby did not disclose until
last week that he had spent $4.5 million of the initial payment on weapons.

"It is patently obvious that without security there can be no development
programs," Deby said in defending the purchases. He said the bank knew
about
the purchases and expressed no disapproval, a statement the World Bank
vehemently denied.

"The!
 Chadian government did not provide us with relevant information until
after
the fact," said Richard Uku, head of the bank's external affairs unit for
Africa.

To reassure the World Bank, the Chadian government has told bank officials
that it has frozen spending of the rest of the money until the Oil Revenues
Control and Monitoring Board begins functioning. It has also promised a
full
accounting of how it spent the first $15 million at a special session of
parliament later this week.



Ottaway reported from Washington.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
      Lori Pottinger, Director, Southern Africa Program,
        and Editor, World Rivers Review
           International Rivers Network
              1847 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, California 94703, USA
                  Tel. (510) 848 1155   Fax (510) 848 1008
                        http://www.irn.org
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to majordomo@netvista.net
with no subject and the following text in the body of the message
"unsubscribe irn-safrica".

----- End of forwarded message from Lori Pottinger -----