[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IPSECKEY] new draft revision (00b)
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 Mark.Andrews@isc.org wrote:
> > 2) byte to distinguish type.
> > FQDN) wire-encode item
> > IPv4) 4 bytes
> > IPv6) 16 bytes
>
> Go with 2. This is a bicycle shed.
It sounds like we have rough consensus on the gateway format. If I've
missed something vital, please speak up. Otherwise, I suggest that
Micheal incorporate the second option into the draft.
As always, read the draft, send comments to the list or the editor.
-- Sam
-
This is the IPSECKEY@sandelman.ca list.
Email to ipseckey-request@sandelman.ca to be removed.