[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IPSECKEY] new revision of draft
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Weiler <weiler@watson.org> writes:
Sam> Section 2.4: Needs to have generic text for any value, then the
Sam> expansion for RSA and maybe mention the DSA doc, but not in it's own
Sam> subsection.
>> I don't understand how what is there is wrong.
Sam> This is now 2.6/2.7. The new section 2.3 isn't clear on how (or if)
Sam> IPSECKEY automatically incorporates newly defined public key formats.
Sam> This needs to be clarified.
okay.
I'd say that if DNSEXT defines a new key format that it should be
permissible to use it. Can you suggest text to this effect?
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-
This is the IPSECKEY@sandelman.ca list.
Email to ipseckey-request@sandelman.ca to be removed.