[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [transformative-change] An analysis of governance as a topic of study.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[Brian, there were [K's at the end of each line. It also took me
awhile to figure out that you were writing the words that started with
':']
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Gibb <bw503@freenet.carleton.ca> writes:
Brian> : There are two points, however, which Russel brings up
Brian> that I don't : agree with and would like to address. The
Brian> first is the idea that we : as citizens no longer concern
Brian> ourselves with geographic boundaries : and
Brian> borders. Although we concern ourselves much less with where
Brian> : the boundaries will be, it is of the utmost importance
Brian> that we : concern ourselves with what these borders bring
Brian> about, organizational : closure.
One thing we can consider is simply moving the borders further
out. To span the planet. When we get a trade agreement like NAFTA,
there are two ways for the unions to react: protect local jobs, or
unionize the Mexicans. Levelling the playing field can mean that the
level is raised. This option seems to be frequently ignored.
Brian> dynamics of one environment : to another. What is critical
Brian> to the sustainability of any : living system is its ability
Brian> to control what passes and what : does not pass through its
Brian> semi-permeable barrier. We can think : of the cell wall as
Brian> being the quintessential example of organizatinal :
Brian> closure.
The barriers need not physical anymore. You give the example of a
TNC that does business worldwide: in this case there are simply
"inside the TNC" and "outside the TNC" rather.
Brian> : The second point concerns the idea that TNC's are
Brian> extremely : centralized. Although the multinational
Brian> corporations which : gave birth to the TNC's were, the rise
Brian> of the digital economy : has enabled them to change their
Brian> structure to something more : akin to an internetworked
Brian> enterprise. For example, a car : company which has its
In other words, they have already changed, and it is government
structure which is lagging. This is one reason why I think we need to
make sure that the other sectors of the economy (I can't recall
Rifkin's two other sectors. Social was one) leapfrog to the next
logical governing style.
:!mcr!: | Network security programming, currently
Michael Richardson | on contract with DataFellows F-Secure IPSec
WWW: <A HREF="http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html">mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca</A>. PGP key available.
Winner of the 1997 O.C.D.L.D.L.P. award.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQB1AwUBNCMJV6ZpLyXYhL+BAQHhvAL8DOd4cDyklmlSftem8sxShfjgG8GbOvG5
KEir+sBuNHurs2AM18i76OwpYSfE03ve6EwIkShZVOjO4yUS8QzzHA5ISaUt3LSZ
f6Mhm+37ps42B2QkVJuzgQjAKtqrRBY7
=SUO5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
====
To unsubscribe from this list, email to transformative-change-request@ox.org,
with the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the email.
References: