[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: Delegate
> With a binary CertDepth or FinalCert (let's use Carl's proposed
> terms, they are more clear), is clear that you must allow the 18/8
> prefix people to delegate. How much is their business.
> I imagine that "MAX_INT" means infinity in SET? So you can simulate
> a binary delegation with the set [0,MAX]. Those who need more detailed
> control can pick integer values.
> Derek> So, how can you ask people to set cert-depths if they don't
> Derek> know how deep those chains need to be?
I think the weight of the arguments (the ones I agree with, anyway:)
favors my earlier assertion that there are actually three meaningful
values: zero, one, and infinity. Unfortunately, that's too much for
a boolean, and a full integer seems a little wasteful.
So the argument stands at "simpler is better" vs. "better safe than sorry".
Any more opinions?
Brian Thomas - Distributed Systems Architect email@example.com
Southwestern Bell firstname.lastname@example.org
One Bell Center, Room 34G3 Tel: 314 235 3141
St. Louis, MO 63101 Fax: 314 235 0162