[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?
Does anyone have anything to say about using whois++ for SPKI, with the
extra fields we discussed yesterday? Is it worth trying to push on this; If
so, I'll write it up in ID format.
Simon
p.s.
The 'simplest' format for storing public keys seems to depend heavily
on what toolkit you use; DER encoded PKCS-1 values seem to be best for
BSAFE, but separately encoded fields seem to be better for RSAREF. Are we
better off avoid anything to do with DER at the expense of making our
format a little bit more complicated?
---
They say in online country So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA Which side are you on?
National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37 APL-CPIO
Follow-Ups:
References: