[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?

To: spki@c2.org
Subject: Re: Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?
From: Martin Hamilton <martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 16:21:28 +0100
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Apr 1996 12:36:26 PDT." <Pine.SOL.3.91.960417122904.3025C-100000@chivalry>
Sender: owner-spki@c2.org


Simon Spero writes:

| Does anyone have anything to say about using whois++ for SPKI, with the 
| extra fields we discussed yesterday? Is it worth trying to push on this; If 
| so, I'll write it up in ID format. 

One thing -

It might be worth working a MIME type for SPKI certificates into this, 
for use over mail, news, HTTP, ... ?

Having said that, I'm not clear on whether this would be a registration 
for SPKI per se (e.g. application/spki-cert) or WHOIS++ templates in 
general (anyone for template/spki-cert ?).  Any thoughts ?

Martin

References:

Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

Prev by Date: Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?
Next by Date: PICS as CA policy labels
Prev by thread: Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?
Next by thread: Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread